0.13/0.13	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_21512 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.13/0.14	% Command    : vampire --ignore_missing on --mode portfolio/casc [--schedule casc_hol_2020] -p tptp -om szs -t %d %s
0.15/0.36	% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
0.15/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.36	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.15/0.36	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.15/0.36	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.15/0.36	% WCLimit    : 180
0.15/0.36	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 12:46:40 EDT 2023
0.15/0.36	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.36	This is a THF_ problem
0.15/0.36	Running vampire_rel_static_ahmed-new-hol_6848 --cores 8 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Gqf9JbpMRf/Vampire---4.8_21512 -m 12000  -t 180
0.15/0.38	% (21727)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1800ds/17Mi)
0.15/0.38	% (21728)ott+1010_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:kws=inv_arity:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:sp=const_frequency:i=74:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1800ds/74Mi)
0.15/0.38	% (21723)dis+10_1:128_hud=1:i=96:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1800ds/96Mi)
0.15/0.38	% (21725)lrs+1002_1:128_au=on:c=on:fsr=off:piset=equals:i=34:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1800ds/34Mi)
0.15/0.38	% (21729)dis+1004_1:1_cha=on:cs=on:fe=off:hud=1:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1800ds/4Mi)
0.15/0.38	% (21730)lrs+1002_1:14_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:sac=on:sos=on:i=915:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1800ds/915Mi)
0.15/0.38	% (21726)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:s2agt=32:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=385:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1800ds/385Mi)
0.15/0.38	% (21724)lrs+10_1:2_cnfonf=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=36:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1800ds/36Mi)
0.15/0.38	% (21729)Instruction limit reached!
0.15/0.38	% (21729)------------------------------
0.15/0.38	% (21729)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.15/0.38	% (21729)Termination reason: Unknown
0.15/0.38	% (21729)Termination phase: Saturation
0.15/0.38	
0.15/0.38	% (21729)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.15/0.38	% (21729)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
0.15/0.38	% (21729)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.15/0.38	% (21729)------------------------------
0.15/0.38	% (21729)------------------------------
0.15/0.39	% (21727)Instruction limit reached!
0.15/0.39	% (21727)------------------------------
0.15/0.39	% (21727)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.15/0.39	% (21727)Termination reason: Unknown
0.15/0.39	% (21727)Termination phase: Saturation
0.15/0.39	
0.15/0.39	% (21727)Memory used [KB]: 5628
0.15/0.39	% (21727)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
0.15/0.39	% (21727)Instructions burned: 17 (million)
0.15/0.39	% (21727)------------------------------
0.15/0.39	% (21727)------------------------------
0.15/0.40	% (21730)First to succeed.
0.15/0.40	% (21723)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
0.15/0.40	% (21730)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.15/0.40	% SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
0.15/0.40	% SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
0.15/0.40	thf(func_def_0, type, cQ: $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.40	thf(func_def_1, type, cP: $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.40	thf(f143,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  $false),
0.15/0.40	  inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f56,f98,f142])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f142,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f141])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f141,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  $false | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f139,f107])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f107,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true = (cQ @ sK0 @ sK3)) | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f106])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f106,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true = (cQ @ sK0 @ sK3)) | ($true != $true) | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f102,f13])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f13,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X10 : $i,X11 : $i] : (($true = (cP @ X10 @ X11)) | ($true = (cQ @ X10 @ X11))) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f11,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ! [X0,X1,X2] : (((cP @ X0 @ X2) != $true) | ($true != (cP @ X2 @ X1)) | ((cP @ X0 @ X1) = $true)) & ! [X3,X4,X5] : (((cQ @ X5 @ X4) = $true) | ($true != (cQ @ X3 @ X4)) | ($true != (cQ @ X5 @ X3))) & ((cQ @ sK1 @ sK0) != $true) & ((cP @ sK2 @ sK3) != $true) & ! [X10,X11] : (($true = (cP @ X10 @ X11)) | ($true = (cQ @ X10 @ X11))) & ! [X12,X13] : (($true = (cQ @ X12 @ X13)) | ($true != (cQ @ X13 @ X12)))),
0.15/0.40	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f8,f10,f9])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f9,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ? [X6,X7] : ($true != (cQ @ X7 @ X6)) => ((cQ @ sK1 @ sK0) != $true)),
0.15/0.40	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f10,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ? [X8,X9] : ($true != (cP @ X8 @ X9)) => ((cP @ sK2 @ sK3) != $true)),
0.15/0.40	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f8,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ! [X0,X1,X2] : (((cP @ X0 @ X2) != $true) | ($true != (cP @ X2 @ X1)) | ((cP @ X0 @ X1) = $true)) & ! [X3,X4,X5] : (((cQ @ X5 @ X4) = $true) | ($true != (cQ @ X3 @ X4)) | ($true != (cQ @ X5 @ X3))) & ? [X6,X7] : ($true != (cQ @ X7 @ X6)) & ? [X8,X9] : ($true != (cP @ X8 @ X9)) & ! [X10,X11] : (($true = (cP @ X10 @ X11)) | ($true = (cQ @ X10 @ X11))) & ! [X12,X13] : (($true = (cQ @ X12 @ X13)) | ($true != (cQ @ X13 @ X12)))),
0.15/0.40	  inference(rectify,[],[f7])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f7,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ! [X6,X7,X5] : (((cP @ X6 @ X5) != $true) | ((cP @ X5 @ X7) != $true) | ($true = (cP @ X6 @ X7))) & ! [X2,X4,X3] : (($true = (cQ @ X3 @ X4)) | ((cQ @ X2 @ X4) != $true) | ($true != (cQ @ X3 @ X2))) & ? [X11,X10] : ($true != (cQ @ X10 @ X11)) & ? [X13,X12] : ($true != (cP @ X13 @ X12)) & ! [X9,X8] : (($true = (cP @ X9 @ X8)) | ($true = (cQ @ X9 @ X8))) & ! [X1,X0] : (((cQ @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ((cQ @ X0 @ X1) != $true))),
0.15/0.40	  inference(flattening,[],[f6])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f6,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  (? [X11,X10] : ($true != (cQ @ X10 @ X11)) & ? [X13,X12] : ($true != (cP @ X13 @ X12))) & (! [X9,X8] : (($true = (cP @ X9 @ X8)) | ($true = (cQ @ X9 @ X8))) & ! [X5,X7,X6] : (($true = (cP @ X6 @ X7)) | (((cP @ X5 @ X7) != $true) | ((cP @ X6 @ X5) != $true))) & ! [X3,X4,X2] : (($true = (cQ @ X3 @ X4)) | (((cQ @ X2 @ X4) != $true) | ($true != (cQ @ X3 @ X2)))) & ! [X1,X0] : (((cQ @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ((cQ @ X0 @ X1) != $true)))),
0.15/0.40	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f5,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ~((! [X9,X8] : (($true = (cP @ X9 @ X8)) | ($true = (cQ @ X9 @ X8))) & ! [X5,X7,X6] : ((((cP @ X5 @ X7) = $true) & ((cP @ X6 @ X5) = $true)) => ($true = (cP @ X6 @ X7))) & ! [X3,X4,X2] : ((((cQ @ X2 @ X4) = $true) & ($true = (cQ @ X3 @ X2))) => ($true = (cQ @ X3 @ X4))) & ! [X0,X1] : (((cQ @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ((cQ @ X1 @ X0) = $true))) => (! [X10,X11] : ($true = (cQ @ X10 @ X11)) | ! [X12,X13] : ($true = (cP @ X13 @ X12))))),
0.15/0.40	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f4,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ~((! [X0,X1] : ((cQ @ X0 @ X1) => (cQ @ X1 @ X0)) & ! [X2,X3,X4] : (((cQ @ X2 @ X4) & (cQ @ X3 @ X2)) => (cQ @ X3 @ X4)) & ! [X5,X6,X7] : (((cP @ X5 @ X7) & (cP @ X6 @ X5)) => (cP @ X6 @ X7)) & ! [X8,X9] : ((cP @ X9 @ X8) | (cQ @ X9 @ X8))) => (! [X10,X11] : (cQ @ X10 @ X11) | ! [X12,X13] : (cP @ X13 @ X12)))),
0.15/0.40	  inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
0.15/0.40	  ~((! [X0,X1] : ((cQ @ X0 @ X1) => (cQ @ X1 @ X0)) & ! [X1,X0,X2] : (((cQ @ X1 @ X2) & (cQ @ X0 @ X1)) => (cQ @ X0 @ X2)) & ! [X1,X0,X2] : (((cP @ X1 @ X2) & (cP @ X0 @ X1)) => (cP @ X0 @ X2)) & ! [X1,X0] : ((cP @ X0 @ X1) | (cQ @ X0 @ X1))) => (! [X0,X1] : (cQ @ X0 @ X1) | ! [X1,X0] : (cP @ X0 @ X1)))),
0.15/0.40	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f1,conjecture,(
0.15/0.40	  (! [X0,X1] : ((cQ @ X0 @ X1) => (cQ @ X1 @ X0)) & ! [X1,X0,X2] : (((cQ @ X1 @ X2) & (cQ @ X0 @ X1)) => (cQ @ X0 @ X2)) & ! [X1,X0,X2] : (((cP @ X1 @ X2) & (cP @ X0 @ X1)) => (cP @ X0 @ X2)) & ! [X1,X0] : ((cP @ X0 @ X1) | (cQ @ X0 @ X1))) => (! [X0,X1] : (cQ @ X0 @ X1) | ! [X1,X0] : (cP @ X0 @ X1))),
0.15/0.40	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Gqf9JbpMRf/Vampire---4.8_21512',cCADE13_pme)).
0.15/0.40	thf(f102,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cP @ sK0 @ sK3)) | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f99])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f99,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != $true) | ($true != (cP @ sK0 @ sK3)) | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f55,f44])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f44,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true = (cQ @ sK2 @ X0)) | ($true != (cP @ X0 @ sK3))) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f43])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f43,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ($true != (cP @ X0 @ sK3)) | ($true = (cQ @ sK2 @ X0))) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f41,f13])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f41,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cP @ sK2 @ X0)) | ($true != (cP @ X0 @ sK3))) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f40])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f40,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != $true) | ($true != (cP @ X0 @ sK3)) | ($true != (cP @ sK2 @ X0))) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f14,f17])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f17,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((cP @ X0 @ X1) = $true) | ((cP @ X0 @ X2) != $true) | ($true != (cP @ X2 @ X1))) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f14,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ((cP @ sK2 @ sK3) != $true)),
0.15/0.40	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f55,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cQ @ sK2 @ sK0)) | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f53])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f53,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  spl4_2 <=> ($true = (cQ @ sK2 @ sK0))),
0.15/0.40	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f139,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cQ @ sK0 @ sK3)) | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f138])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f138,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cQ @ sK0 @ sK3)) | ($true != $true) | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f127,f12])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f12,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X12 : $i,X13 : $i] : (($true = (cQ @ X12 @ X13)) | ($true != (cQ @ X13 @ X12))) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f127,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cQ @ sK3 @ sK0)) | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f123])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f123,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != $true) | ($true != (cQ @ sK3 @ sK0)) | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f104,f23])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f23,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true = (cQ @ sK2 @ sK3))),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f22])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f22,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != $true) | ($true = (cQ @ sK2 @ sK3))),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f14,f13])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f104,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cQ @ sK2 @ X0)) | ($true != (cQ @ X0 @ sK0))) ) | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f100])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f100,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cQ @ sK2 @ X0)) | ($true != $true) | ($true != (cQ @ X0 @ sK0))) ) | spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f55,f16])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f16,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X3 : $i,X4 : $i,X5 : $i] : (((cQ @ X5 @ X4) = $true) | ($true != (cQ @ X3 @ X4)) | ($true != (cQ @ X5 @ X3))) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f98,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f97])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f97,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  $false | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f96,f71])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f71,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cQ @ sK0 @ sK3)) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f70])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f70,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cQ @ sK0 @ sK3)) | ($true != $true) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f62,f12])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f62,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cQ @ sK3 @ sK0)) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f61])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f61,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cQ @ sK3 @ sK0)) | ($true != $true) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f26,f60])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f60,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true = (cQ @ sK1 @ sK3)) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f58])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f58,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true = (cQ @ sK1 @ sK3)) | ($true != $true) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f51,f13])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f51,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cP @ sK1 @ sK3)) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f49])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f49,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  spl4_1 <=> ($true = (cP @ sK1 @ sK3))),
0.15/0.40	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f26,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cQ @ sK1 @ X0)) | ($true != (cQ @ X0 @ sK0))) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f25])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f25,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cQ @ sK1 @ X0)) | ($true != (cQ @ X0 @ sK0)) | ($true != $true)) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f15,f16])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f15,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ((cQ @ sK1 @ sK0) != $true)),
0.15/0.40	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f96,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true = (cQ @ sK0 @ sK3)) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f94])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f94,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true = (cQ @ sK0 @ sK3)) | ($true != $true) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f91,f13])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f91,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cP @ sK0 @ sK3)) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f85])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f85,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cP @ sK0 @ sK3)) | ($true != $true) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f15,f79])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f79,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true = (cQ @ sK1 @ X0)) | ($true != (cP @ X0 @ sK3))) ) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f78])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f78,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cP @ X0 @ sK3)) | ($true != $true) | ($true = (cQ @ sK1 @ X0))) ) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f59,f13])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f59,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cP @ sK1 @ X0)) | ($true != (cP @ X0 @ sK3))) ) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f57])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f57,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cP @ X0 @ sK3)) | ($true != (cP @ sK1 @ X0)) | ($true != $true)) ) | spl4_1),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f51,f17])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f56,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ~spl4_1 | ~spl4_2),
0.15/0.40	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f47,f53,f49])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f47,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cQ @ sK2 @ sK0)) | ($true != (cP @ sK1 @ sK3))),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f46])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f46,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ($true != (cP @ sK1 @ sK3)) | ($true != (cQ @ sK2 @ sK0)) | ($true != $true)),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f30,f44])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f30,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cQ @ X0 @ sK1)) | ($true != (cQ @ X0 @ sK0))) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f29])).
0.15/0.40	thf(f29,plain,(
0.15/0.40	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cQ @ X0 @ sK1)) | ($true != $true) | ($true != (cQ @ X0 @ sK0))) )),
0.15/0.40	  inference(superposition,[],[f26,f12])).
0.15/0.40	% SZS output end Proof for Vampire---4
0.15/0.40	% (21730)------------------------------
0.15/0.40	% (21730)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.15/0.40	% (21730)Termination reason: Refutation
0.15/0.40	
0.15/0.40	% (21730)Memory used [KB]: 5628
0.15/0.40	% (21730)Time elapsed: 0.018 s
0.15/0.40	% (21730)Instructions burned: 20 (million)
0.15/0.40	% (21730)------------------------------
0.15/0.40	% (21730)------------------------------
0.15/0.40	% (21721)Success in time 0.031 s
0.15/0.40	% Vampire---4.8 exiting
0.15/0.40	EOF